Adjuster Estimates

Tags - Popular | FAQ  

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 01/17/2010 12:31 PM by  Tom Toll
What is this? Hail damage?
 26 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
Author Messages
bilbrey
Guest
Guest
Posts:2


--
12/20/2009 12:44 PM

heat blistering,not hail

0
Ray Hall
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts:2443


--
12/20/2009 4:12 PM
No hail on this roof, that I can see. This dark shingle and attic heat has made the shingle age much faster, I still think they are over 12 years old.
0
BennyBulger
Guest
Guest
Posts:37


--
12/21/2009 6:19 PM
I agree, looks like excessive heat damage due to improper ventilation.
0
moco
Member
Member
Posts:122


--
01/11/2010 3:07 PM

A little late to chime in. You stated that no collateral damage to windows, guttering etc, was found. But if pea size hail falling in amount to cause that much roof damage, certainly vehicles parked on the premises would have some sign of damage as well. I favor the opine of defective shingles. I have seen this before and do not relate it to hail.

0
boz
Guest
Guest
Posts:1


--
01/17/2010 11:11 AM
By appearance, this is blistering, a deffect in the shingle possibly. Pictures alone cannot validate hail damage or disprove hail dmage. what does the vents look like, gutters, soft metal. Was damage noted in any of these areas? Drawing a conclusion from this single photo can get you some conclusions that may not be correct. The variables must be present to determine cause, I would lean towards defect but wouldn't sign my name to it until all aspects are inspected.
0
BobH
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Posts:759


--
01/17/2010 11:24 AM
Posted By Bobabooey on 12 Nov 2009 05:47 PM

 

...  There is no collateral damage to windows, gutters, vents, etc.... 

Boz, read his first post, the one that accompanied the photo.  He said no collateral dmg.

Bob H
0
Tom Toll
Moderator & Life Member
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts:1865


--
01/17/2010 12:31 PM

I can tell you right now that I would have to turn in this claim as granular expulsion due to old age or incorrect attic ventilation. This is no sign of impact depression, and no circular patterns of missing granules. If this is what is on the entire roof, it is not a covered cause of loss.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
0
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of Claims Adjusting.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines: 
  • No Advertising. 
  • No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or others to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  • No Flaming or Trolling.
  • No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  • Terms of Use Apply

    Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.