11/12/2009 5:47 PM |
|
Roof is approx 5 years old. Pea sized hail in the area at the largest. Entire roof looks like this. Looks like blistering to me but roof is fairly new. I originally thought it was some kind of defect in the shingle, but the garage was built 2 years after the home and it looks like this as well. There is no collateral damage to windows, gutters, vents, etc.... If it is not hail then why does the garage look the same? If it was the pea sized hail that caused this, how did it do this much damage to a roof that is not very old?
What is this? could it be hail damage?
|
|
0 |
|
11/12/2009 5:51 PM |
|
Nope, defective shingle is all. Ol' Ghost
|
|
0 |
|
claims_rayMember Posts:293
11/12/2009 5:54 PM |
|
I've seen the same damage on other roofs and had also related it to manufacturer's defect.
|
|
0 |
|
11/12/2009 6:00 PM |
|
Problem is that there are installations of two different shingle manufacturing runs (since garage was built at a different time). That would be a strange coincidence. I'm curious to read more about this one. Seems you would have some collateral hail damage if it was hard enough to cause this roof damage.
|
|
0 |
|
BobHVeteran Member Posts:759
11/12/2009 6:34 PM |
|
Pea sized hail in the area at the largest
Right, and that would not be large enough to do damage.
Read this article: http://www.doi.ne.gov/brochure/b_hail.htm
Of course there are other sources as well, but this one really cuts to the chase
Generally, hail must be 1 ¼ inches in diameter (Half-Dollar size) before it causes damage to heavy composite shingles or wood shake shingles. Lightweight composite shingles may show damage after being struck by 1-inch diameter (Quarter size) hail. Only deteriorated composite shingles will show hail damage due to hail less than 1 inch in diameter, and the hail generally must be more than ¾ inch in diameter (Dime size).
If your area has received hail large enough to possibly cause damage to your roof, you may want to examine other objects at ground level before calling your insurance company or pulling out your ladder. Hail strong enough to damage a roof will also cause damage to nearby cars, wood fences, shutters and/or exterior siding.
Those "pock marks" do not look like hail dmg to me. If something with enough weight-inertia to damage asphalt shingles hit that roof, there would be something larger than the itsy-bitsy manifestation we see. Usually real hail will cause some degree of a "soft spot" at the point of impact - this issue did not seem to extend below the surface of granules.
I'm not saying there has to be a visible fracture to the mat, but it often will at least have that tell-tale softness when pressed against.
What weather has this roof been subjected to for 5 years? Hot-Lanta?
Bob H
|
|
0 |
|
11/12/2009 7:05 PM |
|
Just a thought, but when you take the photo to another application and zoom in, the edges of the missing material are sharp. Also the bottom 1/4-1/3 of the shingle in the photo does not exhibit this condition. The comment above about Hot-Lanta begs me to ask if the roof in question had been installed with the titanium film in the roof trusses. This was the rage a few years back to cool the attic and reduce air conditioning bills. I looked at installing this material in Houston, but my research at that time indicated that if the material were installed too close to the decking it would make the granuals on the shingles pop off like popcorn.
Jim Acree
Stupidity is the art of not trying to learn
Ignorance is the lack of opportunity to learn
I am ignorant
|
|
0 |
|
BobHVeteran Member Posts:759
11/12/2009 7:21 PM |
|
Posted By jdacree on 12 Nov 2009 07:05 PM
... it would make the granuals on the shingles pop off like popcorn.
Not familiar with the product you refer to - but a very common one is POOR VENTILATION which will fry a roof before its time.
Bob H
|
|
0 |
|
11/12/2009 7:35 PM |
|
The damage is caused due to a saturated mat during the manufacturing of the shingle. There was to much moisture between the fiberglass base mat and the asphalt mat when there were adhered together. When this happens, the shingle blisters when in direct sunlight and hotter temps to allow for the moisture to exit.
|
|
0 |
|
claims_rayMember Posts:293
11/12/2009 7:42 PM |
|
Yes, I believe that he understands this. However what are the odds that two runs of shingles 3yrs apart have the same defect one on the garage and one on the main structure at the same risk?
|
|
0 |
|
BobHVeteran Member Posts:759
11/12/2009 7:48 PM |
|
Well, if there is no accidental direct physical damage resulting from the claimed Date of Loss...
It's not our duty to ID what is going on with his shingles, but I bet those manifestations were there before whatever storm occurred recently.
Bob H
|
|
0 |
|
11/13/2009 1:27 PM |
|
...just curious what the other roofs in the neighborhood look like? And, can you verify the roof ages?
|
|
0 |
|
Ray HallSenior Member Posts:2443
11/13/2009 8:17 PM |
|
This shingle looks more like 10-12 then 5 years. Its 2nds or regects at best. Heat has a lot to do with this broken blisters, which could be hits by pea size.
|
|
0 |
|
11/13/2009 8:36 PM |
|
Ol' Ghost and BobH have it right IMHO, I see no hail damage nor is there any damage visible from blisters for that matter I don't see any blistes or damage from any other type of physical force. The only answer left if defective shingle. It is certainly possible to have defective singles in two batches two years apart. Ray Hall might also be correct in calling them 2nds. It is probly not worth the time to research if that is the case.
|
|
0 |
|
11/14/2009 1:07 PM |
|
Is the attic/rafter bays vented properly? If the area below the roof sheeting is not vented properly the shingles will overheat. When the shingles overheat the oil in the asphalt leaches to the surface. Since oil is lighter than water, next rain washes the oil off the shingle. Guess what? the oil is what adheres the granule's to the matting. So the granule's simply wash off of the shingle. Check for properly venting of the attic/rafter area below the shingles, before calling the shingles defective. If the venting is adequate I would look for something else next.
|
|
0 |
|
11/14/2009 5:02 PM |
|
I have not keep track but I would estimate, I have seen this on at least 20 to 30 roofs I have inspected here in the Colorado area with 10 to 15 year old shingles. I have attributed this damage to poor ventilation of the roof system. This is the first state I have worked in where there was no requirement for attic ventilation for roofs. It’s not consistent through out the areas so it appears it depended on the builder if the attics were ventilated or not. The other item I have noticed is no drip edge installed on roofs that are approximately 15 to 20 years old.
|
|
0 |
|
okclarrydVeteran Member Posts:954
11/14/2009 8:49 PM |
|
Certain manufacturers' shingles are more prone to blister than others. I would venture a guess that the same roofer did the garage three years after he roofed the house and used the same brand of shingle. The lesser quality shingles allow more profit to the roofer if he charges for high quality shingles. If you could go back and measure the thickness of the shingles, I bet they are thinner than average. Which leads to blistering.
Larry D Hardin
|
|
0 |
|
11/16/2009 9:22 AM |
|
Blisters and not covered. Blisters are common but to this degree it is due to a out of spec run by the manufacturer. The give away for blisters are the sharp edges seen at the pock marks.
|
|
0 |
|
HuskerCatVeteran Member Posts:762
11/18/2009 10:32 PM |
|
Can't specifically tell from the photos...but do these shingles have any organic material?? What about the bird population? I had a couple of perplexing losses a number of years ago, and we found out that pigeons, blackbirds, etc., found part of the shingle granules to be quite tasty. As a previous poster mentioned, what kind of roof do the neighbors have and do they have similar signs of damage?
|
|
0 |
|
11/19/2009 1:02 AM |
|
I was on a roof today, only the rear slope looked like the roof in your photo. I went into the attic and the insulation was all the way up against the soffit area, but only on the back slope. This damage is from excessive heat build up. My two cents for what thats worth.
|
|
0 |
|
11/20/2009 12:39 PM |
|
Seems as though you found the answer. I'd also consider whether the slopes are facing north-south? I wonder about the slope direction since solar exposure is an important issue in Colorado as far as direct damage from the sun. The sun is much more intense at 5,000 feet than at sea level, and CO gets over 300 sunny days a year. These 2 factors cause uneven deterioration of shingles. Shingles on the southern side become brittle / deteriorate much faster than on the north side because of excessive exposure to the sun. East and west facing slopes deteriorate more evenly than north-south slopes. If you add this to the fact that these may be low grade shingles, you may have your answer. The other issue I'd consider is the direction of the storm. As I understand it, most of the hail damage in CO was from the north (ranging from the northeast to northwest), and if the damage is on south side slopes w/ little damage to the north, then you can probably rule out hail again.
One other note about birds... I was on a commercial roof about 2-3 weeks ago, and birds had found the EPDM roof to be fun to poke into. The landlord had contracted with an exterminator firm to get rid of the birds after having several roof leaks because of the bird damage. When I was inspecting the covered loading docks, I found large piles of bird droppings, and there were still about 10 birds that called the building home. I don't know what the attraction was for the birds, but this was a Class A, 45,000 square foot building, so it was not an issue of neglect on the landlord's part. Finally, I understand that EFIS is very attractive to woodpeckers who like to live inside the EFIS layer after they knock holes into the building.
|
|
0 |
|