Adjuster Estimates

Tags - Popular | FAQ  

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 02/09/2007 11:03 AM by  Ray Hall
Are we a danger to ourselves?
 7 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Tom Toll
Moderator & Life Member
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts:1865


--
01/30/2007 1:52 AM

    We all know that technology can be used for both good and evil: the splitting of the atom led to both nuclear power plants and nuclear bombs; GPS can be used to find lost children or by dictatorial governments to keep tabs on their citizens; RFID can be used to improve the efficiency of stocking a store's inventory or to invade our privacy, and so forth. The Internet can be used to keep in touch with faraway family members and expand our knowledge base, or it can be used by pedophiles to prey on children. These are all well-known dangers of technology.

    But what about the more hidden dangers that come with the proliferation of technological gadgets that we enjoy in today's world? You might not see that cell phone or MP3 player in your pocket as a threat to anyone, but can it be putting you - and even others - in danger every day?

    We're not talking about the long-debated question of whether radiation from mobile phones causes brain cancer, or whether the anti-social lyrics of some popular songs are influencing young people to engage in anti-social behavior, although those are worthy topics for the medical community and psychologists/sociologists to investigate. What we're talking about today is the possibility that our tech toys may be placing us in imminent physical danger, by distracting us from the world around us.

    Many cars today have built-in GPS, audio systems that are fancier than ever, DVD players built into headrests, and there are even full fledged computer consoles available that go into the dashboard, and companies are gearing up to offer mobile wi-fi connections designed to keep you on the Internet while you're driving. For the GPS navigation display, even more. Try and scroll through your cell phone's numbers looking for a name to call. You may end up never making that call. At that speed, no seatbelt or air bag will save you.

    Of course, manufacturers of in-car DVD players market them as being for the use of the passengers - but I've passed vehicles on the road at night in which you could see a movie playing, and the driver was the sole occupant. In many jurisdictions, having the screen visible to the driver's seat is against the law, but if the screen is movable, that can be difficult to enforce unless the driver is caught in the act.

    And it is possible to carry the concept of having no distractions available too far. How many of us have had the experience of using the car radio or even a cell phone conversation to keep us awake and alert during a long, dull drive?

    No one deals with more distractions while driving than the police themselves.  These days, most police cars also include mobile display terminals (MDTs), for an added distraction. Yes, in some jurisdictions, police work in pairs and the officer in the passenger seat operates the equipment, but in most smaller departments and many large, budget-challenged ones, two-officer cars is a luxury that's unaffordable. Multitasking while driving is a way of life.

    A National Highway Traffic Safety Administration study a few years ago estimated that 25% of police-reported accidents involve some form of distraction. But interestingly, cell phones and other high tech devices accounted for only a small percentage of those accidents. Many of the distractions that cause accidents are very low tech: talking to passengers, tending to children, adjusting the controls (windshield wipers, lights, air conditioning, mirrors), eating, smoking, swatting insects, and so forth. Still, it makes sense that having more and more devices in the car, even those that aid in driving such as GPS units, provide more potential for distraction.

    And it's not just in the car that the distraction of tech toys can pose a danger. I see people all the time now, walking down the street, in the mall, on airplanes and in other public places, whose glazed eyes give away the fact that they're oblivious to what's going on around them even before you notice the tell-tale earbud. Whether listening to music, audio books or their Bluetooth phones, they obviously aren't paying attention to anything but the "bug" in their ears. Sometimes I wonder how many folks have walked out in front of traffic because of this. And maybe it's just my old cop training, but if a terrorist takes over my plane or someone is robbing the store, I don't want to be the last to know.

    What do you think? Is the proliferation of high tech toys making the roads and other public places more dangerous for us all? Or can we, with the proper training, learn to effectively multitask while driving without creating a safety hazard? Have you ever been guilty of making cell phone calls, watching DVDs or fiddling with the sound system while driving? Should there be laws against such activities? If so, should there also be laws against non-high- tech distractions, such as crying babies, chatty passengers and drive-through restaurants that encourage behind-the-wheel eating?
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    Dimechimes
    Member
    Member
    Posts:196


    --
    01/30/2007 10:22 AM

    Tom- great topic. Here is a link to the Nationwide Insurance press release 1/22/07 on a study they just conducted on DWD- Driving While Distracted and their interesting findings!

    http://www.nationwide.com/nw/newsroom/index.htm

    Visit our Adjusters Information Blog
    www.dimechimes.wordpress.com www.Linkedin.com/in/dimechimesclaimSmentor www.Twitter.com/ClaimSmentor www.ClaimSmentor.com
    Janice R. Martin-Toll
    Life Member
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:35


    --
    01/30/2007 2:41 PM
    This reminds me of a time when I was working a branch assist in South Mississippi.  The branch manager called to tell me that he had a "rush" claim for me and could I take the information and call the insured right away.  I told him to wait a minute until I could pull off the road because I can drive, smoke, and talk on the phone at the same time, but I can't drive, smoke, talk on the phone and write all at the same time.  I wanted to minimize my risk! 
    Janice R. Martin-Toll
    brighton
    Member
    Member
    Posts:139


    --
    01/30/2007 4:47 PM
    One thing that I do miss about the 70's & 80's was that maybe you had a pager. If that went off you found a pay phone and called into the office for the message. Otherwise you did what we called the Dr. Pepper schedule, calling in at 10, 2 & 4 for messages. There was an itinerary your supervisor had of where you were going that day in case they needed you. When you were through with that claim and going to another, it was quiet time.

    Today as Tom brings up, cell phones, mobile link cards for the lap top that is mounted on a rack, gps (talking to you every 30 seconds while on a city street telling you a turn is comming up), power inverters, and I am sure some other disctraction is being developed as I type this.

    We are in the same situation as any Law Enforcement officer is with all the "communication" equipment we now carry. To me, I need that quiet time. It helps when you are in traffic and the only thing I have on is the radio. The phone may or may not be used or answered untill just before I get to my next claim. Yes it is great for letting the insured know you may be a few minutes late or if the directions from the gps, mapquest or what ever are in error. However, most of them build up the stress levels higher than what we already are under.

    I am too young for a heart attack. Besides, the wife won't let me have one as she says that there is not enough insurance on me yet to make her live care free when she does get rid of me or by chance the "Big One" does occur.

    In ending this rambling, remember that more and more states are looking at distraction as the cause of the accident. When the police look at your vehicle and see more communication equipment in it than their units, you can bet that they will put down distraction by the driver if it appears that you were at fault. Want to bet that if that happens, there will be a letter from some friendly lawyer saying that your negligence caused a gazillion dollars in pain, suffering, mental distress, loss of bodily functions, wages, loss of consortum for the spouse, permanent injury and everything else to their client. Oh yeah, unless you have accident forgivenes, you can count on your auto rates going up.
    Rocke Baker
    jlombardo
    Member
    Member
    Posts:145


    --
    02/01/2007 7:53 AM

    Gentlemen;
    I also miss the 70's and 80's (not to mention the 60's)....but remember all the new electronic devices have one thing in common with all the old stuff.....they all have an OFF SWITCH.....if it is getting to you...shut it off........if it is helping you leave it on........
    Frequently I will turn the phone off and the car stereo and just drive.....amazing how good it is for the soul.......Why do you think that most motorcycle riders love to ride.........

    My dresser has a 140 watt stereo, but most times it is not on..especially on the back roads and in traffic.......

    JUST SAY NO AND TURN IT OFF

    Ray Hall
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:2443


    --
    02/08/2007 9:32 PM
    Ole Joe was correct. I had as long streach of highway and forget to turn the radio back up and drove for over an hour just thinking, dont remember what  I was thinking, but it was peaceful.
    HuskerCat
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:762


    --
    02/09/2007 3:52 AM

    Was that you Trader...eastbound on 2-lane Hwy 30 in Cent Nebr today doing 52 mph with truck traffic & flurries?   I was right behind you for about 25 miles, and it wasn't peaceful for me or the other 20 vehs behind! 

    Ray Hall
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:2443


    --
    02/09/2007 11:03 AM
    Sounds like another old adjuster bud of mine, but I know it was not him as he will not work in snow either.
    You are not authorized to post a reply.


    These Forums are dedicated to discussion of Claims Adjusting.

    For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines: 
    • No Advertising. 
    • No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or others to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
    • No Flaming or Trolling.
    • No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
    • Terms of Use Apply

      Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.