Posted By claims_ray on 23 Jan 2012 12:50 PM
However most probable and provable are not the same thing.
You could hire an engineer to determine cause of damage however it would not be cost effective.
The window should be repairable either way.
I second claims_ray's opinion, however I will go a step further to put this one to bed, replace the window and move on. The following is my standing on the matter and others will probably disagree. I have done so for the duration of my 8+ years on the job because that's the way I was taught from the beginning (just because "I" was taught this way does NOT mean others should do so, but it has worked for me.) If there is a gray area as to covered or not covered, repair or replace, I have always errored on the side of the insured.
In this example, assuming as to your initial statement that said window is " a direct result of said event" if it is a toss up as to repair or replace, REPLACE IT and put this claim to bed.
My opinion is the additional dollars required to move this from a repair to a replacement PALES in comparison to losing an insured or getting a plaintiff attorney or a public adjuster involved.
I have been called on to the carpet to which I might add had a plastic sheet over it (if you know what I mean) half a dozen times over the aforementioned decisions "I" have made over the years and every single time I came out alive (I still had a job)
Granted I am no longer in the field, but ANY time an adjuster working under me comes to me with the same dilemma, I give them the go ahead to recommend to replace and I have yet to be called on the carpet for any decision like the one's discussed above
"A good leader leads.....
..... but a great leader is followed !!"
CatAdjusterX@gmail.com