Where does it stop???
I am sick of dealing with roofers lately who have been in the business for less than 2 years. They are taught by the owners of the roofing companies that any shingle that is not sealed down like it is brand new is wind damaged. I am getting tired of the having the same damn argument all day long with these guys. Most of these 22 year old "salesmen/insurance fraud commiting crooks" have never even seen real wind or hail damage.
Just so you know roofers, if a roof is 15 years old and some of the shingles are not sealed-THIS DOES NOT MEAN IT IS WIND DAMAGED!!!!THE ROOF IS OLD. No kind of adhesive lasts forever. They get on the roof and start pulling the shingles up and tell the home owner there roof is damaged and is going to leak. INSURANCE IS NOT A MAINTENENCE POLICY.
My typical roof inspection lately with roofer and homeowner:
INSPECTION-I find no hail or wind damage. Roofer starts grabbing on edge of shingles and pulls up large sections of shingles and says "Look wind lift" I tell him you just pulled up the shingle and there is no debris under the shingle.
ME to homeowner- Sir there is no damage to your roof. It is fine and is in good condition for its age.
ROOFER-He is lying, your roof is damaged and the shingles are lifted and your roof is going to leak. All of your neighbors are getting new roofs.
INSURED-I dont want a new roof if i dont need one but my neighbors are getting roofs and I am afraid it may leak into my home.
ME-I would buy your roof if I could but it is not damaged. When a roof gets older the adhesive on the shingles get old too and is not as strong as it was when it was brand new, then this roofer gets up there and pulls them loose and says it is wind damage. Your roof is in good condition for its age except for the shingles that this roofer pulled up.
ROOFER-I did not pull the shingles loose they were wind damaged and this guy doesnt want to pay. We need to fight this claim because the adjuster has no idea what he is talking about. He is told by the insurance company not to pay.
Then on to the next claim to do the same thing again and again and again.
The sad part is the the insurance company will eventually replace the roof that is not damaged because they will not take it to court. So we are replacing perfectly good roofs that are not damaged so some roofer can make a few bucks. Sad. All of this money is passed down to the policy holders in higher premiums.
What is agravating to me is now they are trying to get roofs bought that are 10 years old and under. They get up there and yank on the shingles and then tell the home owner they have wind damage. I dont mind replacing older roofs but it is frustrating replacing roofs that have years of good use left in them that are not damaged.