Simply Snap, Speak & Send

Tags - Popular | FAQ  

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 05/22/2009 10:46 PM by  ChuckDeaton
tools that can be returned
 21 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
Leland
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts:741


--
05/18/2009 3:19 PM
    Let's say the insured had $4000.00 of Sears Craftsman tools, and $4000.00 of no name tools, both damaged in a fire. You know the Crafstman tools can be reurned to Sears and exchanged for new tools- lifetime warranty with no receipt required.
     
    How would you calculate ACV on the Sears tools?  Just askin'
    0
    Tim_Johnson
    Member
    Member
    Posts:243


    --
    05/18/2009 7:50 PM
    Apply depreciation equal to the amount of sales tax, that's it. A 10 year old craftsman 1/2" ratchet is as good as a brand new one. If the insd. has RC coverage, give him the sales tax back when he replaces the tools. In these situations there is no reason to make it complicated.
    Tim Johnson
    0
    Joeblack
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:47


    --
    05/18/2009 10:22 PM
    I don't necessarily disagree with Tim's approach, and would certainly let it pass if I were sitting on a supervisor's desk, but at the same time I would not find fault with someone who applied some percentage of depreciation to the tools. I haven't been in a pawn shop lately, but as I remember, there are plenty of sets of used Craftsman tools to be had in the pawn shops for less than full replacement price.

    I think you could go either way on this, and not be wrong.
    0
    HuskerCat
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:762


    --
    05/18/2009 11:28 PM
    Likewise, I don't disagree with Tim.  The Craftsman's tools you pay 100% RC, and call it ACV or whatever. And if I'm the staff guy (or the guy with settlement authority), I'd also pay the sales tax up front and close the file.   The "no name" tools apparently are not a part of this equation, but those do become a little more difficult depending on if they are hard tools or electric/etc.  No name tools are always a bargain, and any ACV value applied will likely never come back for a file re-open if you're fair and handle the Craftsman's as mentioned.
     Don't know if this is a HO claim or not, but if these are tools used in the insured's business, you might have a limitation to consider....typically $2500 for property used in business. 
    0
    dcmarlin
    Member
    Member
    Posts:110


    --
    05/19/2009 1:35 AM
    I sort of disagree.  If there is a lifetime warranty on tools with Sears, that agreement is between the Sears and the purchaser.  It has little to do with the insuring agreement (but, in reality, a lot to do with the actual adjustment and settlement). 
     
    l feel hand tools, like most items, have a useful life and, therefore, would apply depreciation accordingly based on age, condition, use, quality, etc.  I do agree a good tool can last a long, long time.  Thus, whether a RCV or ACV policy, the depreciation amount would be minimal.
    Gimme a bottle of anything and a glazed donut ... to go! (DLR)
    0
    Leland
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:741


    --
    05/19/2009 4:07 PM
    OK, let's say it's a daily claim assigned to you the adjuster on a Monday. Because there is water damage (from fire suppression) to some fancy artwork, you send out a contents specialist with the carriers OK. The contents expert gets there Monday PM, a day before you do, and documents all the contents, including the tools. The insured asks the contents expert, "Can I take these tools now that you have seen them?" and the contents expert says "Sure, go ahead."

    When you get to the loss the next day the insured shows you his brand new tools he got on trade in.

    Do you still owe him for the loss? Why? If not,why not and how do you write the denial letter? (Your denial letter must quote policy language or case law or at least give some kind of rational argument)

    assume it is an HO3 if you want.
    0
    Tim_Johnson
    Member
    Member
    Posts:243


    --
    05/19/2009 5:50 PM
    OK. I see what you are saying now. It did not cost him anything to replace the tools. If you pay him anything then he will be profiting on the claim. I will have to think about the coverage in that light. On a side note, I think the Sears replacement agreement says something like failure due to normal wear and tear, if that is the case they would not honor fire damaged tools. I will have to check on that as well.
    Tim Johnson
    0
    Tom Toll
    Moderator & Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1865


    --
    05/19/2009 6:12 PM
    Sears say they will not replace, nor allow trade in on tools that are not damaged by normal wear and tear/breakage. Fire damage is not considered normal wear and tear or breakage.
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    Leland
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:741


    --
    05/19/2009 7:20 PM
    Here's what I think, after reading a homeowner policy (not an HO, but similar):

    On some polices the carrier only owes that cost to replace, if that's all they want to pay: no cost to get the replacement = no payment required. Also the carrier may have the right to replace the property instead of paying money. If the insured is claiming $80,000 for an antique piano the carrier has the option to go find that exact piano for $10,000 and deliver it to the insured. And we need to consider salvage.

    So if you were going to pay ACV you could pay something less than $4000 because even if you were confident if could be returned for new product nobody (in the Fair Market Value world) would pay 100 cents on the dollar just for the pleasure of driving to the store and dealing with the store clerk. And then as the adjuster you would take the salvage items which you could personally handle by returning to sears yourself or getting a bid from a salvor or maybe selling back to the insured, depending on your judgement and what the carrier wants. Of course the easiest way would be to ask the insured to return it themselves, and if they were succesfull you wouldn't owe anything, if not you would. Like Tim and Tom said it's actually not a slam dunk to return fire damaged tools, another example of don't assume, do homework. When I posted this question I thought it was an automatic to return the tools but after I googled it I read otherwise.

    I don't think the carrier can force the insured to return the tools but the carrier does have the right to pay ACV and keep or sell the the tools as salvage. Of course we all know there is a difference between what is possible and what makes sense, depending on whether it is a CAT or a daily claim and how much money is involved.
    0
    Leland
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:741


    --
    05/19/2009 7:25 PM
    let me clarify one thing- don't EVER handle salvage personally unless you have thoroughly discussed it with the carrier and they want you to. It's too much of a sticky issue, but sometimes the carrier gets a lot LESS money by going with a salvor than doing things like selling back to the insured, having the insured find a buyer they know, letting the adjuster help, most salvors will admit that the carrier can get more money elsewhere, just make sure everything you do is discussed and approved...
    0
    ChuckDeaton
    Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1110


    --
    05/19/2009 8:55 PM
    Actual Cash Value (ACV) is Replacement Cost (RCV) less depreciation. Depreciation is figured using age and condition. The only influence Sears has is that a Sears tool is a high quality tool that under normal wear conditions is a life time tool, but then lots of tools are. An HO-3 provides All risk except as excluded coverage at Replacement Cost (RCV) only if the policy is endorsed and replacement is actually made. The undisputed amount is paid, usually ACV and the RCV is paid, less the deductible when receipts are presented. The salvage does not belong to the insurance company until full payment is made.
    "Prattling on and on about being an ass with experience doesn't make someone experienced. It just makes you an ass." Rod Buvens, Pilot grunt
    0
    Leland
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:741


    --
    05/19/2009 9:56 PM
    The standard HO3 language says: "personal property...at actual cash value at the time of loss but not more than the amount required to repair or replace."

    Is "actual cash value" really replacement cost less depreciation? Is that really what the policy says?

    from the H0 3 8/96 washington (other versions are similar)

    ACTUAL CASH VALUE means....b)....the market value of property in a used condition equal to that of the destroyed property, if reasonably available on the used market.

    c. Otherwise, actual cash value means the market value of new, identical or nearly identical property less reasonable deduction for wear and tear, deterioration and obsolescence.

    In plain English this says the ACV is the thrift store/Ebay/Craigslist price unless there aren't any similar items for sale and then (and only then) the ACV is determined by taking today's price for a similar NEW item and subtracting for wear (depreciation).

    To say it another (exagerated ?) way, the policy is telling the adjuster to search Ebay first, and do a depreciation schedule second only if Ebay doesn't have the item. (I'm only half serious, but I wanted to make the point.

    Of course most of us adjusters grab the depreciation schedule first, but that's not actually what the policy says.

    So therefore, if the insured has an item that cost $1000 new, is only 2 years old, in great condition, and similar items can be found for sale at $30.00, that's what the carrier would owe: $30.00. It would not be neccessary to apply depreciation to calculate some kind of theoretical ACV. The carrier simply does not owe one penny more than what that item can be bought for in the used item marketplace. (Ebay, garage sale, craigslist, thriftstore, etc.)

    And if you really could return some tools and get brand new ones the carrier could decide to pay the insured ZERO on the basis that they do not owe "more than the amount required to repair or replace."

    And notice that is says "repair or replace". If the item can be repaired you don't have to list the RCV less ACV or the Ebay price- you could just put down "repair allowance" on your spreadsheet, and show the repair cost.

    I do agree with you that the salvage does not belong to the carrier until full payment is made.

    0
    HuskerCat
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:762


    --
    05/19/2009 10:57 PM

    Going back to post #1, it still makes me wonder about an $8000 tool loss under a HO policy (if it is an HO, that is).  That's a boat load of tools, but I suppose possible, if you have a retired contractor etc.   And then, there is always the definition of "tool" to consider.   On the otherhand, if this is a CPP/BOP with an inland marine tool floater, then you will have specified limits and possibly a scheduled limit for certain items depending on cause of loss and location of loss.

    0
    sbeau4014
    Founding Member
    Member
    Member
    Posts:427


    --
    05/20/2009 8:03 AM
    I'll throw in my .02 cents worth on this as I've dealt with the subject dozens of times with Craftsman and also Snap On tools that carry the same "guarantee" on the tools, and I also have a lot of Craftsman tools. Tom and Tim are correct in that it is a moot point in this circumstance as the risk of fire voids any guarantee that they have on the tool.  It is for nornal wear and tear and defects in the tool itself, and applies to only hand tools to my recollection, not power or air tools. It is also a little misleading in that I've actually used this policy personally on failed ratchet tools, and you don't get a "new" tool for the old, but they replace it with a "rebuilt or refurbished" one.  They don't give you one off of the shelf like you might think.
     
    Policy calls for depreciation and payment on ACV basis, and reimbursement of the depreciation once replacement is made, receipts are presented and then aplicable depreciation is returned up to the amount actually spent depending on replacement apples for apples, etc (if RC is endorsed).  As Chuck said, ACV is replacement cost less depreciation.  Depreciation is based on age and condition.  ACV can also be construed as market value of items, and I've asked numerous policyholders if they were purchasing a group of tools, would they be willing to pay the same amount for 10 year old used Craftsman tools as they would pay for brand new Craftsman tools they picked up from the store. Apply depreciation on them and if they replacement them reimburse them for the depreciation based on what the policy calls for.
     
    As for $8,000 in personal tools a person might have, if all those were hand tools, yes that is a lot for a person to have who isn't either in the building or auto trade, or been in it before.  If you throw in power tools and air tools, a person can easily have that much or more and have never worked as a contractor or mechanic.  Just ask my wife!!!!
    0
    Tom Toll
    Moderator & Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1865


    --
    05/20/2009 9:31 AM
    I am not a mechanic, I think I am an adjuster. Over years I have accumulated in excess of $15,000.00 worth of tools, some my father gave to me and they were used back during WWII. I keep my tools in mint condition, cleaned and oiled. I do not abuse my tools. What would they be worth on the market. There really is no answer to that. It's a guessing game other than trying to find a specific tool on the net. Tool value sometimes increase over time, so take that into consideration. This is not rocket science, but it can get complicated and time consuming on the part of the adjuster. There are several items my father gave to me that are totaly irreplacable. How do you measure their value?
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    ChuckDeaton
    Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1110


    --
    05/20/2009 4:19 PM
    The value of any item is what a willing buyer will pay a willing seller at any given time. Actual Cash Value (ACV) the term used in many different contracts of insurance has been interpreted differently repeatedly in every state.
    "Prattling on and on about being an ass with experience doesn't make someone experienced. It just makes you an ass." Rod Buvens, Pilot grunt
    0
    ChuckDeaton
    Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1110


    --
    05/20/2009 4:54 PM
    Leland, I agree with you, my example has always been a theft claim I handled at St Paul years ago. An insured doctor bought a Sony Beta Max machine then reported it stolen. Investigation showed it to be new and in excellent condition. Applying Replacement Cost (RCV) less depreciation ( in this case nearly 0%) I was about to pay the Actual Cash Value (ACV), Beta Max started off expensive, but this was at the time Beta Max was beaten in the market place by VCR. I don't pay any attention to television so I knew almost nothing about either format, but over the weekend reading the Sunday paper I noticed a Dillard's ad. Dillard had the Sony Beta Max and was selling them off at fire sale prices, so back in the office on Monday I sent the insured the ad and a check. We waived his deductible.
    "Prattling on and on about being an ass with experience doesn't make someone experienced. It just makes you an ass." Rod Buvens, Pilot grunt
    0
    Tim_Johnson
    Member
    Member
    Posts:243


    --
    05/20/2009 8:28 PM
    Sears is very liberal in their tool return policy, I took back a break over bar that I had put a cheetah bar on and twisted the end out of it, they asked what happened to it, sheepishly said "don't know, it broke". They gave me a new one. Chuck is correct, a theft claim is a better scenerio here, insured has $xxxx worth of Craftsman, Snap On, etc tools stolen, what depreciation applies. It is a moot point if he has and RC endorsement, but what if he has an ACV policy, what is fair to him? His 20 year old ratchet is as good as a new one. I still say discount the sales tax and let it rip. However, good points have been made here, such as pawn shop prices on these type of tools, PawPaw passes and MawMaw has a yard sale and sells all of PawPaw's tools for .20 on the dollar. I think the DOI would go with the very little depreciation settlement.
    Tim Johnson
    0
    HuskerCat
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:762


    --
    05/21/2009 2:39 AM
    It all comes down to the carrier...whether it's a staff adjuster...whether it's cat season...whether it's an off-season theft loss for a brand new insured; hey, there are a lot of factors to involve.   There really isn't a final answer on this one.  I've handled enough tool losses in the past to see most scenarios, but am sure there are more.  The commercial losses are more interesting.  And check your coverage forms, or at least if you're an IA make your inside person gives you coverage info if it's off-premise.  The cause of loss form is going to differ, and you might have specified limits or a scheduled list.
    0
    Ray Hall
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:2443


    --
    05/21/2009 11:07 AM
    Hm adjusting problems. Within the last year I have changed my thinking on "used" DVD, blue ray and music disk. I start at the same place the thief starts the pawn shap. The shop owner has a list of all the above media and sells it to customers 100% guaranteed for 25% of the discount store price. This means he paid his source no more than 12.5% for the guaranted media disk. Start think like this and you will get much closer to ACV. Adjusting skills can be aquired.
    0
    You are not authorized to post a reply.
    Page 1 of 212 > >>


    These Forums are dedicated to discussion of Claims Adjusting.

    For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines: 
    • No Advertising. 
    • No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or others to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
    • No Flaming or Trolling.
    • No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
    • Terms of Use Apply

      Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.