Go to previous topic
Go to next topic
Last Post 09/09/2008 11:06 PM by  Roy Estes
IntegraClaim
 50 Replies
Author Messages
Tom Toll
Moderator & Life Member
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts:1865


--
10/10/2006 6:27 PM
    It is my understanding that MS/B is revamping Intega Claim after listening to many adjusters complain about its functionality. Hopefully the new version will be out early next year.

    DDS was probably one of the best estimating programs out there. They listened to the adjusters and made changes as they felt appropiate. When sold, MS/B started listening to profits instead of the adjuster. Perhaps they have or are learning that it is the adjuster who buys their product, not the vendors. I try to stay positive about things, so hopefully the new Intega Claim will be more adjuster inclusive. Keep our fingers crossed.
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    PORTASATGUY
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:49


    --
    10/10/2006 11:26 PM
    I wished they would create a Sketch estimating system like XM8 Has, Fast and reliable!
    R. Estes
    0
    gordon1
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:12


    --
    10/11/2006 6:45 PM
    Overall, I think IntegriClaim is much faster to use & way more user friendly than Xactimate24. In Xact, there are way too many duplicate entries required. Sketch is not that simple, whereas in Integri, you can do it "free-hand".Hopefully,MSB will get their marketing act together so more carriers will use it instead of the cumbersome Xactimate !!!!!!!Xactimate should really start listening to adjusters. They need a point & click option on a room picture for materials like IntegriClaim has in it. Remembering a zillion codes is an antiquated, cumbersome & a time consuming way of doing it. IntegriClaim had codes when it was dos based in the early 90's,time to get with it !!!!
    0
    JimGary
    Member
    Member
    Posts:470


    --
    10/12/2006 11:12 AM
    Having started on MSB then training on Xactimate, I found Xactimate cumbersom and cunfusing, until the trainer from Renfro held a small workshop on Xactimate. He showed us some features that made Xmate amazingly simple. I still like MSB, thats what I have worked with the most, but I do like sketch, and if taught right, it is better than MSB, in my opinion
    I know the voices aren't real, but sometimes they're right!
    0
    RandyC
    Member
    Member
    Posts:197


    --
    10/12/2006 6:02 PM
    Posted By Gordon B. Stockman on 10/11/2006 6:45 PM
    Xactimate should really start listening to adjusters. They need a point & click option on a room picture for materials like IntegriClaim has in it. Remembering a zillion codes is an antiquated, cumbersome & a time consuming way of doing it.
     
    XM8 24 has 10 room pictures.  You move the cursor over door hardware, or roof felt, or whatever you want and then right click and you have your line item choices.  I'll post more details on the XM8 how to get to these.
     
     
    RandyC
     
     
    0
    Charly
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:1


    --
    10/16/2006 7:50 PM

    "...They need a point & click option on a room picture for materials like IntegriClaim has in it...."

    The new version MS/B-Intergriclaim (I was in on Beta) has even more improved and detailed point/click features--interior and exterior of house. There are (were) still a couple of bugs, but I like Integriclaim; probably because it's the only claims software I've used.

    CJ   

    0
    gordon1
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:12


    --
    10/16/2006 8:25 PM
    In my opinion,going from IntegriClaim to Xactimate is like going from driving an automatic transmission to driving a stick shift with a worn clutch & being blind folded.There are no reports which are automatically filled in with information already entered/generated. The reports have to be custom created. The concept is really neat & would be great if I was preparing super detalied take offs for a job where I needed to know exactly how many nails I would need, but I feel it is excessive when it comes to details. There is most likely going to be some sort of supplement anyway on most claims, so why is it necessary to have so much minutia?Xactimate has fewer defaults, which come in real handy when working cat claims for the same carrier or working a bunch of similiar claims.It shouldn't matter what program adjusters use to estimate as long as the scope is correct & pricing consistent. As I stated above, supplements are inevitable. No one tells a carpenter what type of hammer he can use as long as he gets the process & final product correct, it doesn't make a difference.Or am I missing something?
    0
    PORTASATGUY
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:49


    --
    10/17/2006 2:05 AM
    Anyone In Central Florida That Is Very Knowledgable about Integraclaim 8.0 & Com Central???? Email me Id Like to hear from you!
    insuranceadjuster@hughes.net
    R. Estes
    0
    rhida
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:12


    --
    10/21/2006 10:41 PM
    Also looking for someone knowledgable with Integraclaim 8.0 & Com Central in the northern Florida panhandle area, please email me at Rhida@yahoo.com, we can use your assistance.
    0
    Tom Toll
    Moderator & Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1865


    --
    10/31/2006 5:29 PM
    Fourth quarter database is now available from Integraclaim. Give them a call and get yours. Maybe if we load them up with calls, they will start sending them out as they should.
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    Tiger
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:26


    --
    11/01/2006 5:22 PM
    I learned on Integriclaim and later I learned Xactimate. Learning Integriclaim was much easier but once I learned Xactimate I never wanted to go back to Integriclaim...although the roof diagrams and report packages in Integriclaim are nice. ComCentral is great too. Integriclaim's pricing always seems to low and has limited options for line items. For just banging out estimates you can't beat Xactimate.
    0
    Storm Duty
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:17


    --
    11/02/2006 8:48 AM
    I have Xactimate, Integraclaim, and Simsol.  If you want a fast/accurate estimating system I would chose Simsol hands down.  Xactimate has some features that make it easy to estimate with, but the reports/final product from Integra is better than Xactimate could ever be.  When I went through the Integra training, I found it to have too much unnecessary information needed to do a simple appraisal of damage.  It is probably more geared towards the staff adjuster.  I was disappointed at the lack of features as compared with Simsol, but then again maybe I got spoiled by Simsol since I can write twice as many claims in the same amount of time as it takes someone in Xactimate or Integra.

    Bottom line is it shouldn't matter what system you use.  If I tell you to be here tomorrow, I don't care what mode of transportation you take, just as long as you arrive on time.
    0
    PORTASATGUY
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:49


    --
    11/11/2006 8:41 PM

    Keith I just started writing in Integraclaim 8.0 SP2, utilizing Com Central, I wrote in MSB 5.0 a while ago, alto of changes since then. All in all was easily learned, and still looking for shortcuts. I have been dimensioning the diagrams, and re-dimensioning in the estimate, double work if you ask me.

    Also the diagramming window is small, and is hard to get all notes and rooms, slopes into the diagram window without allot of time consummation. Don't know if I'm missing any shortcuts to double diagramming, or making digram window larger, maybe some one knows? Or maybe has a few tips for me. Just seems to me like allot of wasted time in MSB Integraclaim.

     

    The pictures that I download into MSB, are downloaded into the order of which I took the pictures and in order to arrange them in an order constant with your Scoping, you have to do this in Microsoft or another program because MSB does not show you the Pictures unless you preview them and even then thats only one Picture, With XM8 You preview every picture. Basically with XM8 you Upload into Program, arrange them, and word them. With MSB, you Download them and Have to manually preview every one! WASTE OF TIME IF YOU ASK ME!

    I did the same Theft/Vandalism Claim in both MSB, and In XM8....Both latest and greatest versions, and the XM8 Estimate from start to close was by far faster, and the Bottom Line was more money In My Pocket. the Gross claim with XM8 in Same Zip Code and Updated that day was by about $1,760.00 Gross on an $22,000.00 Estimate.

    I better get used to MSB because I will be writing in it for a long time to come. I just wish they would get their program a little more tweaked, and better organized for quicker and more expedient estimating.

     

    Didn't take me as long to 'GET IT" like it did XM8, But with XM8 It is Much more of a streamlined and defined estimate, and to me is allot quicker. All the way from Xacentral to the final closure of the claim.

     

    Bottom Line with MSB, intgrate diagramming with the estimate, make the diagram pages larger window, get rid of the icons, make it to where you can preview all pictures as you are writing notes about them so that you can organize. There are a few times when you think you may have forgot a room, or a slope and retake the pics, and then need to organize them in the order of the estimate. Maybe MSB Folks will read this and do something about it!

     

    My 2 Cents worth.

     

    R. Estes
    0
    Storm Duty
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:17


    --
    11/14/2006 7:29 AM
    Roy, You can see the issue with too much information needed for a simple appraisal. Xactimate atleast gives you a faster estimate time, but I personally do not like the final product/reporting features. If I had carriers that could take my estimate through XactCentral, it would make things easier, but since alot of my clients are middle tier carriers, they allow us to email a completed product. For me to do that with Xactimate, I have to print several pdfs and merge them into one. With Simsol, I print it as 1 file including my simple to create custom reports that each carrier requests. I don't have to sell them on one size fits most reports that come standard with Xactimate.
    0
    gordon1
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:12


    --
    11/14/2006 10:26 PM
    If you want to email me, I think I know a little trick which makes it so you only have to enter the dimensions once for the diagram
    0
    PORTASATGUY
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:49


    --
    11/23/2006 11:09 AM

    Well With MSB 8.0 SP2, and Com Central.

    1. They need to make it to where all the pictures show as thumbnails, instead of clicking to review, to be able to sort your pictures without a bunch of time.
    2. Thery need to make it to where, when you diagram a roof, or permiter, the deminsions automatically roll into the estimate, and creates the elevation or room. Instead of a lot of time and double data entry. VERY TIME CONSUMING!
    3. Com Central will not allow you to re-open a claim without it being a suppliment, after it has been sent up, closed and ready for examiner.
    4. When you set up a macro, for a room or whatever, it duplicates the estimate line items, but not like it is written, the wording like "SPECIAL" and "PAINT" or the quality of the line item shows up, and you have to go back and erase those words, if you dont want it in your estimate.
    5. The diagram windows are way too small, they need to make it to where it is a full page, so that you can actually get in a good diagram. Or room drawing. In addition the Icons are way to large for the diagram.

    Does anyone know how to get ahold of the decision makers at MS&B, as I would LOVE to be able to speak with them, I am considering a petition to MS&B, with thousands of names. Including with the carriers that utilize Com Central and MS&B for their preferred tool of estimating.

     

    I am all about timie, and ease and simplicity. They need to make these things and maybe a few others happen SOON, or they will lose, and their business will spiral.

    My opinion, and since I will be writing in MS&B daily from here until the next forseeable future, I am a trooper and an advocate for simplicity for all.

     

    R. Estes
    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    11/23/2006 11:52 PM

    Roy as you can read MSB has named 20+ executives so far just this year and I am sure some of these changes will meet your concerns. The owners of MSB, MDA did not assume management control of MSB per past new releases until 1 Jan 2006 and as you can see they have been busy naming new department heads. Some changes may be due to some that got a share of the $90 million bonus paid by MDA to Boston Ventures this year may have taken the cash and looked for a different pasture to graze. MDA is placing some heavy bets I read on the UK property valuation market and has MSB developing for that new interest. You can read below about Tony Boobier that heads up the international effort and is who is based in London, England.

     

    MSB Promotes Linnell to Assistant Vice President

    Released: 9/27/2006

     

    MSB Names Mejia National Sales Consultant

    Released: 8/29/200

    MSB Names Ozier Director of Claims Products

    Released: 8/16/2006

    MSB Streamlines Customer Support Efforts

    Released: 8/1/2006

    MSB Names Hetchler Director of Analytics, Claims

    Released: 7/18/2006

    Farmers Alliance Insurance Reports Success with MSB’s Tele-Estimating™ Services

    Released: 7/18/2006

    MSB Promotes Twitchell to Assistant VP of Product Development

    Released: 7/14/2006

    MSB Improves, Expands CAT-Ready Claim Support

    Released: 7/11/2006

    MSB Names Foreman VP of Product Development

    Released: 7/11/2006

    MSB Names Lorthioir Chief Knowledge Officer

    Released: 7/10/2006

    MSB Promotes Garlow to VP of Operations

    Released: 7/6/2006

    MSB Promotes Shugar to Chief Operating Officer

    Released: 7/6/2006

    Advanced Field Services Integrates Field Information Transfer from MSB

    Released: 7/5/2006

    MSB Announces Successful IntegriClaim™ 8.0 Rollout

    Released: 5/10/2006

    MSB Announces Appointments

    Released: 5/5/2006

    Tom Soucy Appointed Corporate Controller at MSB

    Released: 4/27/2006

    MSB Announces Release of IntegriClaim Express 2.2

    Released: 4/2/2006

    Cornerstone Appraisal Services and MSB Form Strategic Alliance: High value home inspection vendor joins forces with MSB

    Released: 3/13/2006

    Tony Boobier Heads New MSB International Solutions Division

    Released: 3/7/2006

    From my understanding MDA has MSB developing solutions for the UK market at this time.

     

    MSB Announces Appointments

    Released: 2/21/2006

    MSB Announces Executive Appointments

    Released: 2/21/2006

    MSB EXECUTIVE SEMINAR TOUTS ANALYTICS, BEST PRACTICES TO IMPROVE CARRIER PERFORMANCE

    Released: 1/25/2006

    MS/B APPOINTS MARK BURKHART AS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF SALES

    Released: 1/3/2006

    0
    rickhans
    Member
    Member
    Posts:111


    --
    11/25/2006 9:56 AM
    Test post using Netscape
    0
    upandover
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:3


    --
    12/09/2006 12:17 AM
    The next rebirth of IntegriClaim will be released in about 3 years time. Development is currently starting in Canada (not in the New Berlin Wisconsin office) by software engineers who have developed intelligence gathering information systems for militarys across the Western world.

    For sure, Xactimate and Simsol don't stand a chance.

    The Canucks came early in the year - and then BAM, they set up shop in the office full time among the developers who have hammered at IntegriClaim for the past 5 years.

    Basically, the New Berlin developers are to be kept on staff for the next 4 years to maintain the existing IntegriClaim platform and help ease the transition to the new platform.

    MDA being a global corporation and having interests in Europe also means they will conquer the Western world when it comes to claims processing and evaluation software. The competitors in size just don't come close to matching the share firepower of MDA.

    In all its probably for the best, since the existing IntegriClaim platform is at best now just a sadly mutilated guppy - attacked by near-sighted management and unrealistic deadlines to meet customer expectations.

    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    12/09/2006 1:41 AM

    Devin, thanks for the update on what had been rumored for sometime. I bet the folks over at ISO will feel like fools after paying over 25 million for Xactimate just to see their investment become worthless in a few years. I expect Simsol will be fine with their loyal user base.

    0
    Tom Toll
    Moderator & Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1865


    --
    12/10/2006 3:07 PM
    Devin, I certainly agree with the comment on short and narrow mindedness of the upper management. We have been paying royally for a half baked system for about 6 years now. Too bad they could not get the ball rolling on a superior system before now. I will probably be really retired by the time it comes to fruitition. A friend of mine told me about the transition a number of months ago, but he said it would be available in about one year, not three.

    I/C cost a lot of adjusters a lot of money in the Katrina fiasco, vendors too. Too bad they cannot be sued, but with their disclaimer, they can write all the junk they want to and we have to put up with it. They should be help accountable for their screw ups. I figure I/C cost Janice and I at least $15,000. during Katrina.
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    jlombardo
    Member
    Member
    Posts:145


    --
    12/11/2006 9:17 AM
    Gale,
    what makes you think that Xactimate will stagnate over the next 3 years???? Just a question???
    Do you have some inside track that would indicate same????
    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    12/11/2006 10:02 AM

    Joseph, I do not think that. That was Devin from MSB who was indicating in his post that MDA was going to take out Xactimate and Simsol that I was referring to in my post. It is my position if MDA takes three years to straighten out the pig in a poke (MSB) that Boston Ventures sold them for $340 million that they may be starting out with zero U.S. users in three years. While ISO may make some missteps with Xactware it will not be anything fatal I expect. Xactimate has been eating away at the MSB customer base for the past 5 years and started out as a strong company. Speaking only of the adjusting component that makes up MSB today all three companies were failing to survive in the adjusting software arena in for one reason or another from what I could learn.

     

    It is hard to take three losing players (as far as claims handling solutions go) and expect a merger with the main objective to turn a small investment without adding real value into a huge profit in a few short years and make things work long term. The late Friday night post by someone indicating to be a current MSB employee stating MDA is throwing in the towel on MSB (IntegriClaim) and starting over with their own team of developers and cutting the current development team at MSB at some point indicates the stress level is high. It was some time ago in the old forum where one of the MSB support staff stated some strong statements in the MSB thread that was similar in nature to what Devin posted last Friday evening but only without the current state of affairs as Devin reported.

     

    I doubt if anyone besides Devin thinks MDA is going to put ISO out of the claims handling industry. I think Devin may need to think that to help him survive what may be a hellish environment today. MSB has followed the predicted path that was expected by some following the 2001 announcement of their creation by Boston Ventures. I expect MDA will continue their focus on the Canadian and UK markets and withdrawal from the US claims handling market and write MSB off as a learning experience to look to see what is in the bag before you pay the seller his price.

     

    Maybe the advice, “Don’t buy a pig in a poke” is not well known in Canada as it is in the southern parts of the US.

    0
    Ray Hall
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:2443


    --
    12/11/2006 5:12 PM

    The future of  temp. cat adjusters from outside to inside work will eliminate the need for software training schools. One boot up disk- one adjusters computer will also be impacted.

    It seems unless the carriers can down load the estimate software into the carriers CMS this will work against the intended goal for the switch. Each keystroke takes time. I would expect many claims would be settled in the carriers log system with the adjusters notes and SOL.

    0
    upandover
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:3


    --
    12/11/2006 10:21 PM
    Tom,

    Like many businesses, MDA sought MSB for the right reasons - MSB is a highly profitable company. However, MDA did not know the details of why or how MSB was so profitable. Sounds like they could have simply asked you.

    The MSB sales department had already sold and promised new features to our high profile clients before we ever heard a whisper of them. Sales would come down and say, we need the sofware to do this, and we need it in weeks.

    MSB did not respect their technical department leaders. As soon as someone would state it would take a year to create designs and implement the features properly, they were intimidated by sublime threats of poor leadership and dismissal. The courageous leaders that were there were either promptly dismissed by the MSB vice presidents in LA or berated to the point of dying to leave.

    So the VP's and the sales department got their way, the technical side of the software suffered, and while many of the sofware solutions from MSB work, they tend not to work very reliably - and they certainly do not extend easily for future growth. The end result is hack upon hack which made the sofware increasing more difficult to maintain, extend, and debug with every new development push. The executives never understood that if they just allowed the technical department at the very least one year to make a good design, they would save three man years in future development efforts. But as I said earlier, MSB thought they could just hire more people and  make them work extended hours, push out barely sustainable software, and the whole while charge its customers handsomely for it.

    Well, their poor decisions have finally caught up with them - or more unfortunately, to MDA. Once MDA finally sent its own technical staff to inspect what they had just purchased, they immediately decided they would have to build their own platform and gradually phase out the current software. On the plus side, they now own MSB's data analytics and cost database.

    Gail,

    There is no doubt in my mind Xactaware is a duck dead in the water. Under the covers, that sofware is very akin to the rag doll sofware MSB has. It usually takes a clean sweep of upper management to decide to incur eight quarters of loss to expense a platform rewrite. Those people simply do not understand long term gain at the expense of short term loss. They fail to trust their technical department on that type of investment. Therefore, the software solutions of both of these companies have been piece mealed together over the years. ISO has vendor visibility and recognition, but as MSB found out with AllState, that doesn't mean a thing once something better comes along. ISO is probably in the same ship as MDA in realizing the piece of dung they have purchased.

    As a side note, MDA is not just interested in the UK. MSB does not even conduct business outside of the US and Canada - and their software is not built to handle foreign languages or currencies in any other markets. MDA bought MSB to attain its North American customer base, expansive price databases, and cost analysis tools. MDA bought MSB to dominate the US market, make no mistake about that.

    As for me, there has been another classic MSB developer turnover - I am among many who left when faced with the prospect of maintaing poor software until the point it expired.

    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    12/11/2006 11:08 PM

    Devin, while you may be correct about Xactimate/Xactnet yet I would not be surprised if last year they netted more than the IntegriClaim/ComCentral solution has netted in its entire life span. Clearly MDA has not showed in the past any interest in the property claims handling industry and would have possibly have paid even more for MSB had not the IntegriClaim business been part of the deal.

    0
    PORTASATGUY
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:49


    --
    12/24/2006 2:48 AM

    If the Upper level Management of ALL SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS For the Claims Industry would LISTEN to the professional users, or shall we say CUSTOMERS who keep the doors open, then MAYBE  MS&B, and Xacware, would have something. To me Xactimate has Better and a more proficient and timely manner in which to estimate including the sketch programming, Xactcentral, and the macro programming. MS&B has a real sucky diagramming tool, macro system, Com central system, and the Estimates takes TWICE the time it takes for the same items In Xactimate. However MS&B Does have a great report database in many ways.

    Id say that Software that incorporates the Sketch programming of XM8, the Macro System of XM8, The Picture Programming of XM8, The Price Database upload system of XM8, and the Report system of MS&B Then that would be a Superior Software program that would warrant the high fees we pay to XM8, MS&B or in my case BOTH.

    I can HONESTLY SAY THAT WHOMEVER DOES THIS FIRST, WILL IN FACT GAIN THE UPPER HAND AND HAVE SOMETHING TO MARKET! To me, at this Point, I use MS&B Because I HAVE TO, and Not because I want to, Id MUCH RATHER write in XM8 any Day, Unfortunately it isn't up to me at this point!

    Bottom Line I can Write an Estimate in XM8 of around 35,000 Fire loss in 1/4 the time it takes me to write in MS&B, and it because of all the Diagramming issues, Double Dimensioning, Changing the Wording, Like "PAINT PAINT" or "SPECIAL" and if I Build a Nice Macro, and save it Like I want the Line Item Wording to say it doesn't matter because it only remembers the DATABASE Line items, and SO I have TO RE TWEAK the Wording. TIME!

    When I Upload Pictures into MS&B I have to Load My Pics into a File on My Puter, Rename them A1, A2, a3, a4, etc, for the dern things to upload in an order consistent with my estimate, SHAME ON ME if I have a Few Pics out of Order, because you cannot manipulate the order of the pictures in MS&B because you can ONLY Preview one Picture at a time, In XM8, at least you can arrange by grabbing and maneuvering them in an order consistent with the estimate!

    Loading a DISK when there is another pricing database............ COMMON, I had a SALESMAN tell me, Its because its a large File, When In Fact it is the SMALL SERVERS at MS&B that wont handle multi data loads.

     

    Hey and FORGET about uploading a claim to Com Central and Marking it "READY FOR EXAMINER" At Least In XM8 you can Manipulate the Estimate to Re Open the Claim without getting a supervisor involved in the event you get a call from the insured telling you the mitigation contractor found flooring UNDER the Vinyl flooring when they tore it out, a day after you inspected the claim, WHY SUPPLEMENT THIS, Reopen the claim and add the Line items and then Re-upload the claim with Activity notes thereto.

    Should not be too hard to fix these problems without re doing the entire Database is it?

     

    Respectfuly

     

    R. Estes
    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    12/24/2006 4:54 PM

    Roy it is clear there is frustration with estimating software packages on the market today. Like you most have a “preferred” package but few seem to have the “ideal” package. Well the “ideal” adjusting software may be more like the “ideal” husband or wife that is sought but most would agree all adjusting software could become closer to “ideal” than it is today.

     

    Devin makes some excellent points about software development issues.

     

    If it was left up to developers there would never be another release of adjusting software. Never as in NEVER!

     

    If it was left up to sales there would be another release of adjusting software after every sales call. Every as in EVERY!

     

    In the history of adjusting software I have yet to see one software package stay on the market long term after it was sold and the one with the initial vision has left the scene. Software development is an emotional/thought activity and not a technical activity. If software development was mainly a technical process then you could wire some money to India or China (the next two world superpowers we are told) and say I want accounting, adjusting or any other type of software developed then it would magically appear. Been there and tried that and it does not work that way.

     

    Since everything starts out as a thought then the environment Devine describes at MSB today precludes the thought process if developers are just trying to react to sales so as not to get fired. When developers stop thinking and start reacting the results are not what sales demanded to be developed. Been there and tried that and it does not work that way.

    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    01/01/2007 2:33 AM

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/t...nted=print

     

    Devin, when I read the above article about how VC firms with good track records have poured $350 million into start up firms who’s stated goal is to get a chuck of the search engine business from Google I thought about your post concerning MDA buying MSB and ISO buying Xactware. The logic these billionaires give in investing in start up firms going up again Google is because Google is branching into so many other areas that they may loose their edge in the search engine business. Also there is the question in the mind of one if the current Google management team up to running a $141 billion dollar company. That is a valid concern in any company that has doubled in value as many times as Google has in their short history.

     

    You stated, “ISO has vendor visibility and recognition, but as MSB found out with AllState, that doesn't mean a thing once something better comes along.” By that statement was you stating from the position of an insider that it is a fact that Allstate is leaving MSB? It was stated (I think back in the old forum) that long term Allstate that committed to moving to Xactimate.

     

    If MSB has in fact loss the Allstate account why would MDA who historically has had zero interest in claims adjusting software be willing to build NexGen at the cost of millions to replace IntegriClaim three years from now? If Allstate walks away from MDA/MSB what carrier would seriously look at picking up a vendor that that has lost as many major accounts as MSB has over the past 5 years?

    0
    scadjuster5
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:1


    --
    01/16/2007 10:18 PM
    So, is IntegriClaim starting over from scratch?
    0
    Tom Toll
    Moderator & Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1865


    --
    02/21/2007 4:38 PM
    My HP Pavillion zd7000 is taking a nosedive. I have been pricing laptops for the past 3 days and can find nothing with XP on it, they all have Vista. I understood from one adjuster that Vista does not support Integriclaim, so I called MSB technical and was told this: No, Vista will not support Integriclaim at this time. I was told after installing IC that I could call microsoft and they could guide me to where the system would run, yeah, right. I was also informed that the last part of March that IC had a new program coming out and that it  would support Vista. I have heard new program dates before and I am sorry, I don't believe IC. The technician was not sure, so he went to his supervisor to get this information. Now that is what I call an informed technical department. Their technicians don't even know the answer to my question.

    Microsoft has had a beta of Vista for months. Why the heck did MSB not download it and make it compatible with Vista, knowing the product was coming out soon. I lost my confidence in MSB during Katrina and am just about through with them. If Cunningham Lindsey were not running their program, I would switch to Simsol or Powerclaim. I do not like Xactware at all. Apparently John and Gayle had the wherewithalls to get it and made sure it was compatible with their systems, hooray for them and good thinking.

    steve.fordham@msbinfo.com is the contact I have with MSB. He is the VP of marketing, I believe. I suggest that all users of IC start bombarding him with questions about where MSB is going and why they have not made their program compatible with Vista. Could be they will get tired of our questions and start doing something for the adjuster.
    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    Jgoodman
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:35


    --
    02/21/2007 9:00 PM

    Dell is still selling desktops with XP since the large corporate clients are still using XP.  I had a client order one yesterday.  It looks as if the entire Latitude line still has XP available.   Just check the Dell website.  I cannot get the link to paste correctly.

    But I imagine that all the retail outlets only have Vista machines.  It needs more hardware, which mean more cost.

    Good luck in your search.

    Jeff

    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    02/22/2007 10:45 PM

    Tom thanks for the kind words about Simsol and PowerClaim. While MSB and Xactware may have missed the Vista grand opening and that is causing some stress for adjusters there is the fact that each changed ownership in 2006. Actually the ownership of MSB had changed from Boston Ventures to MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd (MDA) before 2006 but Boston Ventures maintained management of MSB through 2005 and as I understand it earned a $90 million bonus for hitting 2005 projections. Perhaps focus can be lost when the dealing is being done.

    0
    rickhans
    Member
    Member
    Posts:111


    --
    02/23/2007 12:38 AM
    Tom & Gale,

    I have not posted in quite a while but had to get in on the comments above about Vista and IntegraClaim. As I have mentioned before on this site, besides adjusting, I have been developing software for about 40 years and have a good guess as to what is happening here, and it is just a guess. Gale, If you know otherwise, please correct me. For the last 20 years I have been developing software using Bourland Pascal. Bourland's Delphi system is an offshoot of the Bourland Pascal that  was created to develop Pascal software under Window's operating systems when Window's 98 came out or possibly earlier. Paradox is a database system by Bourland that will run with Delphi and other software systems.

    After installing Integraclaim a few weeks ago, I got some assistance from their technical support and asked them what language they developed it in and was told Bourland Paradox. During a discussion he indicated they do use Borland Pascal which probably means Delphi.

    According to documentation on Code Gear's (a division of Borland) web site, Delphi 2007 is out and contains routines to run in Vista. Nothing was mentioned about Paradox. I suspect that the development platform used for Integraclaim has not been updated, or at least not proven to be bug free under Vista. Regardless of what exact version or type of compiler and data base they have developed under, a developer can not just "make it compatible with Vista". The company that produces the compilers and/or platform software to base a software product on, has to first make their software work, beta test it, then give it to the public. This has been a common problem with compilers for years when new operating systems came out. It took quite a few years before Bourland spun off a different version of their software to compile Pascal programs to run them on Linux operating systems. Because of the industry's slow response to new operating systems, it makes it difficult for developers to be ready for new operating systems, and in the case of Linux, has prevented Linux from taking a larger percentage of the customer base from Microsoft. I have not looked at Linux for a couple of years so I may be behind in my knowledge of what is now available.

    Even software companies who develop using Microsoft compilers and database systems will quite often have a conversion to go through. For a while, programs were upward compatible. Most Dos programs would run under Win 95 & 98, but then Microsoft changed things up preventing many programs from running under XP. I had systems installed at customer's sites using Lantastic network software, but when XP came out, Lantastic would no longer work. Microsoft also drops earlier products requiring the customers to buy newer versions specifcally programmed to run only on their latest OS. If Vista's internal functions have been changed, the developer could have a substantial job porting their sources to Vista.

    I am afraid this might more of an answer than was wanted, but I only know how to give detail explanations when it comes to software.

    One additional note: There are many small computer shops around who will sell you a laptop or computer with any OS you want.  Some developers carry laptops with swapout drives to change operating systems as needed.  Look for a mom and pop store that has one or two computer guru's working there and you should be able to XP, Linux, or even 98 if you still want it.  I know of one store in Lakeland, Fl. that I got a quote from for this exact configuration while there in 2004.
    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    02/23/2007 8:28 AM
     

    Rick you raised a valid question and may be on target. We know Borland was in its heyday in the late 80’s and early 90’s with nice market share in several areas and while the Borland name has been brought back into use today the company has a very different focus. My early development days about 38 years ago were with RPG-2 and in the early 90’s we were more on the hardware side of technology and starting in 1995 when we got into software development as a company we decided to be basically a Microsoft shop until their operation system falls into disuse which still is years away I expect. While what you mentioned about perhaps the foundational development technology of IntegriClaim not having evolved over the years had crossed my mind I never gave it any serious thought because our own plate is full because even being a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner developer the technology treadmill to stay current seems to get faster and faster. 

    Below is some info on Borland Paradox I read this morning and it does to seem to lend support to your thoughts. We know through others that Ron Pylant was working on DDS during the Northridge earthquake and at that time Borland would have been an attractive option to going the Microsoft route. At NACA in January 2007 some that attended the MSB training class stated they were told in 18 months IC would be replaced with a new system and earlier in this same tread someone by the name Devin Bonaire posted on 12/08/2006 that it would be 36 months and he went into the mindset of MDA today.

    If IntegriClaim has boxed itself in not being able to move past the Windows XP operating systems it was not a surprise to them I am sure. After Boston Ventures bought DDS in 2001 and rolled it into the new company called MSB and the founder left the company one can see how the direction could go from producing leading edge technology to then making the bottom line look good so someone like MDA would pay $$$. Based on Tom’s post we will know the bottom line per the MSB rep he spoke with that in the next five weeks they are going to be ready for Vista. If by chance they are locked out of the Vista market for the next three years that will be the same as forever in the world of technology.

    Rick thank you for your detailed post and the history lesson as well. Woops the technology treadmill did not stop why I was typing this post so I have to now run to catch up. : )

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_(database)

    Paradox for DOS was a relational database management system originally released by Ansa-Software. In September 1987, Borland purchased Ansa-Software, including their Paradox/DOS 2.0 software. Notable classic versions were 3.5 and 4.5. Versions up to 3.5 were evolutions from 1.0. Version 4.0 and 4.5 were retooled in the Borland C++ windowing toolkit and used a different extended memory access scheme.

    Paradox is a relational database management system currently published by Corel Corporation. It was originally designed for DOS but a Windows version was released by Borland in 1992.

    0
    rickhans
    Member
    Member
    Posts:111


    --
    02/24/2007 1:31 AM
    Gale, I did a little research and it looks like that probably is their problem. IC on my computer contains Borland Data Base which supports Paradox and Delphi, and it appears there are Paradox files being used if I am intrepreting the file extensions correctly. This could slow them down as I guessed. I would like to see them port the software to Linux, but I don't know how big a job that would be. It has been at least 2 years since I researched porting our software to Linux and don't know the status today of the Borland products for Linux. Although I have not used Linux yet, one nice thing about it is that it does not crash like Windows, and is more secure on the internet, and if you have to run a Windows based program, you can crank up Windows as a task running under Linux.

    There is a local company (in Plano) that, like us, was developing all of their software in Borland Pascal and I believed used Dos Paradox. The converted to Windows and Delphi but it was a massive effort and if I remember correctly, took them about 2 years to get bug free. They said they hoped they never had to go through such a conversion again. Conversions are never easy, so if these Borland products are not compatible with Vista, they have a big job ahead of them and I wish them success. I would hate to be stuck with such a project.
    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    02/24/2007 6:15 AM

    Rick last fall at a tradeshow a MSB rep told us he had seen mock up screens of NexGen (as he called it) and at that time a team was gathering user input that would be used when they create the new estimating software solution. This may mean they are investing in new technology if they can not go forward due to the old technology no longer being upgradeable if that is actually the case based on what you were told by a MSB tech. This drives home the fact that developing with tools from companies that change course with no way forward is risky business but 15 years ago Paradox was hot. While Xactimate 24 will not run on Vista due to their using the older MSDE database engine at least they can just replace it with the free and better replacement called SQL Server 2005 Express Edition and keep selling their version 24 as long as they wish without rushing the development a new solution to market. Not everyone is in love with Microsoft but they do take steps to preserve one’s assets.

    0
    rickhans
    Member
    Member
    Posts:111


    --
    02/25/2007 6:15 PM
    You are correct when it comes to developing application software. The software I develop and maintain is DOS based and is a dedicated application for fast food Point of Sale processing and includes real time data capturing over the LAN. I don't have any plans to port it to Windows because of the continuous changes in the operating systems and the loss of ability to contol interrupts and the computer. There are others now producing DOS look alike operating systems and there are quite a few after market products to adapt USB hardware to Dos applications.

    As I mentioned before, I wish more companies would put their money in developing applications to run on Linux which is a stable OS and does not change like Windows does.
    0
    LG
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:5


    --
    07/23/2008 4:21 PM

    How much is Integriclaim when activated?

    0
    johnpostava
    SIMSOL.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:140


    --
    07/24/2008 10:12 AM
    I made a tidy living for the 11 years while I adjusted claims using the DOS version of simsol. Even now, 13 years after we released our first Windows version we still have 50 or so users still using the DOS version. Years ago when simsol was having meetings with Marshall and Swift (before the buy-out) the owners told me estimating software was becoming a commodity and the future was in data analysis. Insurance company execs see estimating software systems as basically all the same. Simsol started as a 100% software development company. Now I would say we are 50% develoment and 50% a service business. I commend MSB for taking on the challenge of building a new system from the ground up. I am sure it cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars if not millions. Software development is alot like remodeling your house - it ends up costing you double what you thought and takes twice as long as you planned. I am curious to see the new MSB but they are only re-eventing the wheel and in the current marketplace I seriously doubt they will gain any signifcant additional marketshare or make back their investment.
    0
    okclarryd
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:954


    --
    07/24/2008 9:08 PM

    John, et al

    In my humble opinion, Integraclaim has become so corrupted and changed from the original DDS that any reinvention of the wheel would be a major improvement.

    Unless, of course, it's just a little mayonnaise and bread with no substance in the sandwich

    Larry D Hardin
    0
    upandover
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:3


    --
    07/28/2008 8:23 AM

    As a previous developer at the New Berlin office a few years ago, I can confirm Integriclaim was written in Borland Delphi and does use Paradox on the desktop.

    Most of the back-end server systems were being iteratively updated to C# .NET code. IntegriClaim Express (the web application) was written in C#, ComCentral had components here and there ported to C#.

    I suspect the new software on the desktop may be written in JAVA since the MDA technical staff which reviewed the software back in 2005 were JAVA centric; however, it is also possible the software could be written in C# as well - since there was a history at the New Berlin office of using .NET.

    There was talk of using Delphi .NET, however, I believe the consensus was to move away from Delphi syntax to C# or JAVA, and MDA's review may have swung the door to JAVA regardless.

    I will say there was talk of the New Berlin development staff simply supporting the old Delphi code until the MDA development house in Canada could roll out a new Java-based product.

    In any event, I'm quite sure the new product will be sound and solid - as MDA has a long history of technology products used in the defense and geospatial information industry, so the new product development will have benefited from a far better iterative development and testing process, and superior systems design.

    0
    Tim_Johnson
    Member
    Member
    Posts:243


    --
    07/28/2008 8:34 AM
    That's what I was thinking.
    Tim Johnson
    0
    Tom Toll
    Moderator & Life Member
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Posts:1865


    --
    07/28/2008 8:57 AM

    I am tired of thinking about it and hearing about it.  I just want to see it done. I know sofware development is difficult at best, but they need to roll it out ASAP to save customers. For five years I have heard of changes for the better to be made, then we lose money in the Katrina event due to the failure of ComCentral. Talk is cheap, action is solid. I would love to see some action.

    Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    0
    Gale Hawkins
    PowerClaim.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:386


    --
    07/28/2008 11:39 AM

    www.homeinspectorsuk.co.uk/

    From the financial press MDA has put a lot of money/resources in to HIP (Home Inspection Packs) industry and will control a good sector of the UK market. At the PLRB 2008 I was told MDA has MSB developing solutions for the UK market. You can read the UK laws that mandates the HIP industry so it is a captive market. While the credit in the UK is currently tight this industry does not look so good and weaker players are currently leaving which will be good for MDA/MSB in the end I expect.

    From what I can gather the US claims handling industry had never been mentioned as a factor in the profits of MDA but the HIP industry and its future impact on the long term financial health of MDA is discussed on a regular bases. We will see if MDA puts it focus on the markets where the financial press has their focus. MDA stock is held by major Canadian pension plans since it is one of the world class Canadian companies to own.

     

    0
    JohnTuttle
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:1


    --
    08/28/2008 10:37 AM

    I've run into a brick wall with MSB IntegriClaim support.  After my initial activation last Saturday, I have not been able to communicate with ComCentral.  I have a Vista 32-bit machine.  I can get to the internet.  I can send and receive email with attachments.  Here's the solutions I've been given:  Antivirus programs (removed), Windows Firewall (turned off), Compatibility tab to run as XP (done), Internet connection too slow (tried faster connections).  I also added IC claim exe to the firewall exceptions.  I'll receive an install disk today, so I haven't been able to uninstall and reinstall.

    I was told third hand that someone at MSB tech support has the work around.  They deny it.  I've been on the phone with them for 6+ hours.  I've tested my laptop with very good internet connection 3 mbs and it won't download.

    Help!  Does anyone have any other ideas for me?     Thanks in advance.

     

    0
    johnpostava
    SIMSOL.com
    Member
    Member
    Posts:140


    --
    08/31/2008 11:31 AM

    My guess is that it is not MSB but something in your computer configuration that is conflicting with their application.  It could be VISTA, any firewall, anti-spam, email blocker or anit-virus system currently running in the background and not known to you.  The way we handle such problems (rare in our case but it does come up time to time) is the turn all of these applications off and try to run the non-running app.  If you are sure EVERYTHING is off and you have a clean boot up and the non-running app is still not working, it may be the way the operating system is running on your computer.

    Even though VISTA is the newest OP, we still recommend XP whenever possible.  Hope MSB tech support steps up to the plate and work with you.  As a last resort you may have to send them your laptop or give them access remotely and let them reconfigure it correctly.  We have had to do this with several of our users and achieved much success.

    0
    roni
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:25

    --
    08/31/2008 11:49 AM

    I had this problem using integri a while back. There is a work around that involved manipulating a file in MSB. Tech support should be able to help but too often they just blame your system and say "no one else is having the issue". Good luck with them.

    The answer that will solve all of your integri problems

    is quite simple.....

      SIMSOL  

     

    0
    swink_d
    Member
    Member
    Posts:96


    --
    09/02/2008 1:35 AM

    I had an issue like this

     

    It turned out to be a component in my Operating System XP that required the settings being changed   I wand to say BDE admin settings, but that may not be correct

    MSB tech walked me through the fix

    0
    Perry_G
    Guest
    Guest
    Posts:1


    --
    09/09/2008 12:10 PM

    The only true pen based property claims estimating system is Symbility Mobile Claims. www.symbilitysolutions.com designed from the ground up for tablet and slate users, Symbility Mobile Claims users can capture the entire scope, photos, diagram, audio dictation and and written call outs without the use of a keyboard. Plus capturing your measurements with a Disto range finder and feeding into your Mobile Claims diagram couldn't be easier.  Craftsman residential and commercial cost data used and updated monthly and sometimes daily. Do it all and present to the insured on the spot  for signature. Yes, the insured can accept and sign on your tablet. You can purchase decent, reliable tablets now for under $1000. So what's your excuse?

    Visit our web site 24/7 to register and/or activate your new Symbility account. You will only be billed for your usage on a per claim basis. No contract. Web training availabe.

     For more information about Mobile Claims visit our web site or call 1-866 - Symbility.

    Perry

    0
    Roy Estes
    Member
    Member
    Posts:155


    --
    09/09/2008 11:06 PM

    MSB IS EASY TO USE, I USE IT DAILY, IF ANYONE HAS PROBS LET ME KNOW AND ILL SEE IF I CAN MESS YOU UP, CONFUSE YOU OR HELP YOU! HEHEHEHE!

    "Each of us as human beings has a responsibility to reach out to help our brothers and sisters affected by disasters. One day it may be us or our loved ones needing someone to reach out and help." RC ESTES
    0


    ---